Apparently there's a new book on the subject of those magnificiently unidentified flying objects (well, unidentified insofar as it's unclear as to if it's Reptoids or Grays who are piloting them ) that's creating a bit of buzz with UFO crowd. Consisting of collected essays by Leslie Kean, this one

link directly below wrote:is about facts. She details what really happened in specific and noteworthy UFO cases that in some instances made worldwide headlines and others were never made public. She cites official documents (not disputed documents) and interviews the military or government officials involved.

http://uforum.blogspot.com/2010/08/revi ... -ufos.html

Here's two pertinent U-t00bs for the book for those who like to watch vidz instead of reading:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jh0ByBkhEtQ[/youtube]
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_vQ4FC9pTU[/youtube]

Was wondering if anybody local has had a chance to peruse this evidenlty ground-breaking tome as of yet?

Was wondering if anybody local has had a chance to peruse this evidenlty ground-breaking tome as of yet?

What's the point, same BS, different book.

From the link...

UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go On the Record is a collection of essays, some penned by Kean herself, about officially-documented and investigated UFO cases that were considered unexplained by government and military investigators. And just as the longish title infers, testimony by well-placed individuals who are and were in positions to know the facts and details about significant UFO incidents show that there is something truly perplexing going on in the skies overhead.

The Jimmy Hoffa case is still unexplained, should we just assume that it's aliens as well?

Kaku did his best to appear very credulous in this interview.

He did, didn't he? Well, he's always (as in, as long as I've known of him) been on a rather sensationalist slant so it's not wonder he doesn't more strongly rule out "extraterrestial origin of UFOs" (EOOU) hypothesis.

On the book, I was rather hoping it's not the usual "same shit" (the review posted in the above blog specifically says it steers clear of the most obvious pitfalls such as giving credence to the so-called abductees and contactees) tho the conclusions do appear to please the EOOU crowd.