Moderators: Calilasseia, ADParker
Fallible wrote:No, I meant maybe you haven’t been here all the time non-stop. There was a poster here (a troll) who asked that, in an attempt to promulgate the idea that he was the serious one. You know how it goes. P
Sofista wrote:What is Pseudo-skepticism?
Sofista wrote:could you show examples of pseudo-skepticism?
Sofista wrote:The Scientific Method still can not prove the existence of the spirits and the life after the death !!
Sofista wrote: just because something hasn't been proven and established in mainstream science doesn't mean it doesn't exist or isn't true. If it did, then nothing would exist until proven or discovered.
Sofista wrote:For Pseudo-Skeptics, reliable evidence must be measurable in some conventional way and reproduced at our disposal. The problem with that is that what we can measure is still limited to our level of technology.
Sofista wrote:Then prove that spirits do not exist? Inversion of the burden of proof is a pseudo-skeptic argument !!
Fallible wrote:Ok that is IT!! NO ONE makes me think of Phil Collins!!
felltoearth wrote:Just another day in paradise.
Blackadder wrote:If leaving Ratskep is easy, then coming back is harder.
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest