Regina wrote:It's ultimately a question of marketing.
You mean, sort of like the difference between juggling spoons and juggling carving knives.
Moderators: Calilasseia, ADParker
Regina wrote:It's ultimately a question of marketing.
lobawad wrote:Sorry to bum your high, I think you'll find that the market for abominable rapping is well saturated.
Destroyer wrote:
I guess that we should all be exremely grateful to have your wisdom policing this forum.
lobawad wrote:I am ignorant of which definition of "existence" you are using. Please, enlighten me.
lobawad wrote:Destroyer wrote:GrahamH wrote:Destroyer wrote:
This discussion is not about my scientific knowledge (which is vacuous, to say the least) but about the cause of existence; of which I have plenty to say.
I am confident that you have nothing coherent to say about "the cause of existence" because the concept is incoherent.
The concept is only incoherent to the ignorant.
I am ignorant of which definition of "existence" you are using. Please, enlighten me.
Destroyer wrote:There is only one definition of existence: "that which exists".
Destroyer wrote:GrahamH wrote:
I am confident that you have nothing coherent to say about "the cause of existence" because the concept is incoherent.
The concept is only incoherent to the ignorant.
Destroyer wrote:
Existence = Existence... There is only one definition of existence: "that which exists".
GrahamH wrote:
Seeking a cause for existence we would have to start with the non-existent, obviously.
GrahamH wrote:Destroyer wrote:GrahamH wrote:Destroyer wrote:
This discussion is not about my scientific knowledge (which is vacuous, to say the least) but about the cause of existence; of which I have plenty to say.
I am confident that you have nothing coherent to say about "the cause of existence" because the concept is incoherent.
The concept is only incoherent to the ignorant.
Seeking a cause for existence we would have to start with the non-existent, obviously. Your move...
lobawad wrote:
Permission to speak candidly, sir!
You don't know what the fuck you are talking about. Jesus H. Christ home-gargoyle, even a minute of the winternet will reveal that there is more than one definition of existence.
Cito di Pense wrote:
And end. Every operator has come into existence simultaneously with its corresponding annihilation operator. The arguments to operators are secondary to the operators themselves. There isn't really anything that isn't canceled out by something else that necessarily exists.
Conclusion: Nothing exists. In reality.
Destroyer wrote:Cito di Pense wrote:
And end. Every operator has come into existence simultaneously with its corresponding annihilation operator. The arguments to operators are secondary to the operators themselves. There isn't really anything that isn't canceled out by something else that necessarily exists.
Conclusion: Nothing exists. In reality.
Correct.
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 2 guests