You didn't make an argument, you merely asserted and assumed your conclusion. As has been pointed out to you multiple times now.
Moderators: kiore, Blip, The_Metatron
SafeAsMilk wrote:You realize how obvious it is that you have no idea how to construct a reasoned argument, right? You never support your claims and you never show how they lead to anything. It's just saying whatever you want and expecting people to accept it, there's nothing for anyone to discuss. You clearly have no interest in any sort of discussion whatsoever, which is probably why your immediate reaction to anyone pointing out these problems is to personally attack them, as you've done here.
absolute chaos is a crock because it only applies to 'nothing', so does not apply at all, whereas absolute order can only apply to God.
Firstly, let us consider the meaning of absolute order - what would that entail? Well, it would necessarily entail that the whole system/environment be 'self' explanatory, which means that the system as a whole must have a singular explanation for the order therein.
an argument that proves that something exists wouldn't also prove that nothing exists.
SafeAsMilk wrote:
You did read the part where spinozagalt said my points were correct, right?
jamest wrote:If you want a serious convo with me, then you'll have to do the same thing.
jamest wrote:SafeAsMilk wrote:
You did read the part where spinozagalt said my points were correct, right?
spinoza addressed the OP and asked questions relating to specific statements, which I have since responded to. If you want a serious convo with me, then you'll have to do the same thing. Otherwise, come over to my place, I have a large freezer which might interest you.
Thommo wrote:Definition: Order is the opposite of chaos.
Definition: Chaos is the opposite of order.
What I mean by "opposite" should be unclear from context.
Thommo wrote:Definition: Order is the opposite of chaos.
Definition: Chaos is the opposite of order.
What I mean by "opposite" should be unclear from context.
Thommo wrote:
Sorry, this argument is not complete. You need a premise that order exists. Only then will your thesis be ready for submission.
Spearthrower wrote:
It's basically a human version of a post-modernism gibberish generator.
jamest wrote:Either we're having a discussion about the OP, or we're not. It's up to you guys, but a discussion will revolve around questions, not unqualified judgements.
Spearthrower wrote:Hmmm, I think I can do away with that unnecessary distraction:
If God exists then God exists
God exists
Therefore God exists
jamest wrote:Either we're having a discussion about the OP, or we're not. It's up to you guys, but a discussion will revolve around questions, not unqualified judgements.
Spearthrower wrote:
Hmmm, I think I can do away with that unnecessary distraction:
If God exists then God exists
God exists
Therefore God exists
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest