Repetition in an infinite universe

juju7 · **#81** by **juju7** » Mar 02, 2016 7:50 am

DavidMcC wrote:
Veida wrote:
DavidMcC wrote:It could also not have started a finite time ago.

Why not?

Because it would then have had to expand at an infinite rate for at least part of the time between now and the start. Now, you might like to believe that is plausible, but a physicist would not.

I don't think you can speak for all physicists.

Veida · **#82** by **Veida** » Mar 02, 2016 10:16 am

DavidMcC wrote:
Veida wrote:
DavidMcC wrote:It could also not have started a finite time ago.

Why not?

Because it would then have had to expand at an infinite rate for at least part of the time between now and the start. Now, you might like to believe that is plausible, but a physicist would not.

Now you're assuming it wasn't infinite to begin with, right?

Arnold Layne · **#83** by **Arnold Layne** » Mar 02, 2016 10:51 am

What's happening in the 1/(infinity) thread proves there is repetition in an infinite universe! :smoke:

juju7 · **#84** by **juju7** » Mar 04, 2016 7:07 am

juju7 wrote:
DavidMcC wrote:
Veida wrote:
DavidMcC wrote:It could also not have started a finite time ago.

Why not?

Because it would then have had to expand at an infinite rate for at least part of the time between now and the start. Now, you might like to believe that is plausible, but a physicist would not.

I don't think you can speak for all physicists.

https://richarddawkins.net/2016/03/no-b ... beginning/

Repetition in an infinite universe

Re: Repetition in an infinite universe

Re: Repetition in an infinite universe

Re: Repetition in an infinite universe

Re: Repetition in an infinite universe

Who is online