,,,

TE, when did you last post about photon volume in this thread? I seem to be having trouble finding even one such post.

DavidMcC wrote:TE, when did you last post about photon volume in this thread? I seem to be having trouble finding even one such post.

David how many times do I need to remind you that I don't give a fuck about your hypocritical lectures on on-topic posting?
And where did you answer Newolder's question?

I am not going to respond to TE's idiotic, off-topic posts. They have already distracted me from more serious posts, such as by newolder (who has his own problems, as I have already described, but which are less off-topic than TE).

DavidMcC wrote:I am not going to respond to TE's idiotic, off-topic posts.

Q fucking E fucking D.

DavidMcC wrote: They have already distracted me from more serious posts, such as by newolder (who has his own problems,

Unless your intent is to make an unsubstantiated personalised remark about newolder, I suggest you rephrase that.

DavidMcC wrote:as I have already described, but which are less off-topic than TE).

Do you really not realise that this thinly veiled whining does not erase your own off-topic posting in this thread?

..
The usual rubbish.
Even newolder has resorted to blatant wind-ups like his most recent post in this thread. (ASIDE: He probably wants revenge for some much earlier argument we had over his espousal of FTL, travel in an old thread.)

OK, I am boycotting this thread until someone else says something relevant to photon physics, if not photon volume. Hasn't happened yet.

DavidMcC wrote:..
The usual rubbish.

You could change your tune by keeping your word as well as not desperately accusing your interlocutors of all manner of off-topic nonsense.

DavidMcC wrote:Even newolder has resorted to blatant wind-ups like his most recent post in this thread.

QED. Physician heal thyself.

DavidMcC wrote: (ASIDE: He probably wants revenge for some much earlier argument we had over his espousal of FTL, travel in an old thread.)

Delusional, truly delusional.

I am no longer going to respond to anyone who does not even attempt to address the topic of this thread.

DavidMcC wrote:OK, I am boycotting this thread

Woe betides us. Whatever shall we do without David's insane ramblings?

DavidMcC wrote: until someone else says something relevant to photon physics, if not photon volume.

If only anyone gave a fig about your personal demands.

DavidMcC wrote: Hasn't happened yet.

And the fields still lay barren.

DavidMcC wrote:I am no longer going to respond to anyone who does not even attempt to address the topic of this thread.

Since you were lying when you posted this less than an hour ago:

DavidMcC wrote:OK, I am boycotting this thread until someone else says something relevant to photon physics, if not photon volume. Hasn't happened yet.

Why should anyone believe you this time?
Or is it that you just don't understand the words you're using?

Of course, what I should have said, is "it hasn't happened with YOU yet".

It seems to be a TE speciality to push the subject away from the OP and towards your favourite (only?) subject of generating a nice big, off-topic row, using your tried and tested methods of irrelevant posting.

I will not waste any more time on TE, I promise.

DavidMcC wrote:Of course, what I should have said, is "it hasn't happened with YOU yet".

Nope, that in no way adressing the point I raised.

DavidMcC wrote:
It seems to be a TE speciality to push the subject away from the OP

Oh look, more unsubstantiated and off-topic accusations.

DavidMcC wrote: and towards your favourite (only?) subject of generating a nice big, off-topic row, using your tried and tested methods of irrelevant posting.

Again, stop projecting your own issues onto me.

DavidMcC wrote:I will not waste any more time on TE, I promise.

So you've promised multiple times already, only to immediately break your word.

Thomas Eshuis wrote:Look at the plank in your own eye David.

The Planck, surely?

hackenslash wrote:

Thomas Eshuis wrote:Look at the plank in your own eye David.

The Planck, surely?

Please show me "the plank in my own eye". I'd liketo see it, really, I would.
I see that the hack has decided to weigh in. I guess it was only a matter of time, now that the topic I was trying to stick to when TE weighed in has had to be abandoned due to lack of interest.

DavidMcC wrote:..
...
Even newolder has resorted to blatant wind-ups like his most recent post in this thread.

I asked a couple of relevant questions. You chose not to answer. Heigh ho.

(ASIDE: He probably wants revenge for some much earlier argument we had over his espousal of FTL, travel in an old thread.)

(ASIDE: How about posting in the relevant topic with quotes to where I posted that FTL travel is impossible or that FTL travel is observed beyond the scope of considerations on Universal expansion?)

DavidMcC wrote:Please show me "the plank in my own eye". I'd liketo see it, really, I would.

You seem to be impervious to selfreflection and self-criticism David.
You post baseless accusations that have fuck all to do with the topic and then proceed to lecture others about posting off-topic.

DavidMcC wrote:I see that the hack has decided to weigh in. I guess it was only a matter of time, now that the topic I was trying to stick to when TE weighed in has had to be abandoned due to lack of interest.

Still projecting your own fantasies I see.