kyrani99 wrote:Paul is a rogue in my opinion and estimations. He wrote fiction and it is being kind to call it simply fiction.
No, he did not write fiction, or anything else, for "Paul" is merely a character in an exposition of mythological fiction, the Jesus story.
https://celiameyer.wordpress.com/2013/0 ... narration/ With Watson serving as a narrator, readers get a first person account of Sherlock and his character traits and habits, which somehow become more believable because they are conveyed through a real person, and not an omniscient presence.
Was Dr. Watson "a real person"? When in human history did this magical formula first appear: i.e. convey a story line "through a real person"--himself or herself, a fictional character, inserted into the story to increase plausibility? Does Lucian write in similar fashion, using fictional narrators?
On the old FRDB board, a few years ago, there was an imposter who logged in, using the moniker "Outhouse". Outhouse was a genuine person, still alive today, so far as I am aware, still posting fiction one supposes, in other words, still expressing fictional sentiments that have no bearing on the underlying, genuine human's own thoughts--to add to the aura of uniqueness, "Outhouse" would sometimes attack even himself, rather, his genuine counterpart's submissions. Somehow, the texts of this chap, kyrani99, remind me of outhouse's submissions. In other words, I doubt that kyrani99 genuinely believes the texts of his submissions to the forum. If he did, why would he not furnish evidence to support his ideas?
Here's another clue:
kyrani99 wrote: I see circumstantial evidence for the existence of some preacher, Paul or whoever.
Yet, as in almost all of his other submissions to the forum, no link, and no evidence is provided, by this poster. Meaningless palaver. goal: rile folks up, but make no effort to support, or repudiate genuine submissions to the forum.
The essential feature of "Outhouse's" posts: unwieldy tracts of nonsense, designed to derail a thread, often with an accusatory tone, directed at specific individuals, including, among others, himself (his genuine persona), dejuror, MM, duvduv, and myself. His submissions were designed not to elucidate, but to provoke reaction.
Whatever "circumstantial evidence" exists to attest to Paul as a genuine human, and not a fictional character, will surely apply with equal facility to Dr. Watson. Paul is a character in a fictional story, no different than Al Buraq, until someone comes up with a reference, i.e. a link to a reference, attesting to "Paul's" whereabouts in 33 CE, and thereafter. Dr. Watson narrated many stories of Holmes' adventures. If you seek to persuade me that Watson was not a fictional character, but a genuine human, I need someone other than A.C. Doyle to relate Dr. Watson's life story.