rationalskepticism.org

rainbow wrote:

sennekuyl wrote:That wouldn't be abiogenesis, now, would it?

I think it might be, or at least establish that it is possible under a certain set of conditions.

Acknowledged. I misread the statement and took the wrong tack. Your question is compatible with the idea of abiogenesis.

That fact that researchers are searching for a suitable mechanism might actually be relevant?

Perfectly relevant.

Then I don't know what point you are trying to make. Are you trying to make a point?

Or are you disputing that the hypothesis are the most logical conclusions from what we do know?

There are a number of hypotheses. To which one of these are you referring?

Well, there is a number of hypotheses to which the mechanism of abiogenesis is purported to be possible via, but there is really only two main ponderings regarding abiogenesis: was it by some extension of known means (repeatable by some circumstances at some potential point) or was by a currently completely indecipherable means (sometimes taken be 'supernatural'). To which your posts appear to imply.