Posted: Apr 19, 2010 8:47 am
Spearthrower wrote:Rainbow wrote:Works like this, sam.
You answer my questions before expecting me to answer yours.
OK?
No, cut, cut, cut!
This is precisely the same problem that occurred in the last 25 takes.
Rainbow: your initial post is titled with a question asking IF chemical reactions are non-random, then your post's question asks what determines chemical reactions. To answer the latter, one has to agree with the former. It's a bit much to expect people to follow this thread by means of open questions.
Why not (and this is an honest suggestion that I am sure would net better interaction with people) state an argument and support it, then invite people to dispute your claims.
I.e.
Chemical reactions ARE non-random and the deterministic force is electromagnetism.
Then provide some reasoning.
Otherwise, we're going to have another recap of all the previous posts, and we all know how that ends. For the sake of good discussion, please consider my suggestion.
Thanks for your suggestion, spear.
However, I wish to open the thread as a question.
...now a suggestion for you.
If you don't know the answer, you say:
"I don't know"