rationalskepticism.org

Pulsar wrote:

zaybu wrote:It would seem that this issue has been resolved.

No, it's just another proposal, among the countless others. It remains to be seen whether this holds any water.

But now you have two papers, the one by van Elburg, and this one by Satish Ramakrishna, that give the same explanation as to the causes of the "60ns" anomaly. It's true that the Opera team hasn't comment on them, but nevertheles, it would be hard to believe that these two different papers would be wrong.

EDIT: the Ramakrishna's paper gives a better account.