rationalskepticism.org

newolder wrote:

DavidMcC wrote:

newolder wrote:

DavidMcC wrote:
So why did R&S talk about brane collisions causing big bangs?

Where did they do this? (Perhaps you are thinking of Paul Steinhardt & Neil Turok and their ekpyrotic model. )

That's possible, but S&T also referred to branes in the TV interview.

You seem to be more confused than usual, today.

I admit only that it has been several years since I thought about half-baked cosmologies, and may have got names mixed up.