rationalskepticism.org

DavidMcC wrote:

Cito di Pense wrote:

DavidMcC wrote:This is the physics forum, not the post BS at David forum,OK?

If it is, post some physics, instead of sepulchral pronouncements, such as:

DavidMcC wrote:...there is no specific volume associated with a photon in the first place.

I was, because what I said is correct, "sepulchral" or not. PS, please translate sepulchral into a meanigful physics term.

From my own pit of questions, could you translate "photon" into meaningful physics terms and describe how a single "photon" in a double slit experiment gets to its final position on the screen?