Posted: Jan 28, 2020 8:42 am
by Spearthrower
Scott Mayers wrote:Note that I place quotes around the word, "science", because I'm referring to the meaning of it as understood by practice, not that I am against the concept and validity of it. That is, "science" comes from meaning "to see", and is only in used in contrast to mere "logic", which used to mean "to look" but has evolved to be separated from the act of observing and relegated to the "analysis" of what we see more specifically.



Your version isn't science: it's hubris.

Science clearly works - you can see it all around you.

What inventions, discoveries, and applications have you arrived at through "logic"?

If you want to set this up as a contest between scientific methodology and whatever your methodology is, then you'd better put up and show that you can compete.