Posted: Jan 31, 2020 1:30 am
Macdoc wrote:Religious = failure to require evidence so why should anyone consider anything you say worth listening to. Thought you were leaving.
That you can't be get by the logic nonsense puts you square in Jamest woo woo world. When you have some evidence ...bring it....otherwise...well....
Religious thinking == one who demands FAITH as the apriori justification upon the AUTHORITY of some claim or any institution based upon those claims.
ANY theory by anyone who isn't privileged to the 'evidence' of some stated STANDARD MODEL or to who is unable to PARTICIPATE in the observations, the interpretation of them, and the logic essential in deriving such conclusions, cannot blindly believe in it and be expected to disprove what is yet proven to them.
So please, if you don't like my expression of thought here, PROVE why my ARGUMENTS are faulty.