Posted: Apr 18, 2022 11:34 am
by Macdoc
Not entirely sure what your point is?

Impacts at all sites
Most of the SEA conclusions regarding the potential impact of an RPV store apply to all the shortlisted sites. These are summarised below.
On all sites, there would be minor negative effects from greenhouse gases and energy use for all stages of the project lifecycle though construction, use and eventual decommissioning.
Minor adverse temporary effects are anticipated during construction and decommissioning:
 There is potential for temporary disturbance of habitats and/or wildlife.
 Despite mitigation, there will be some noise and vibration.
 Minor changes to local roads may be required but they are expected to be of minor significance.
 There is some potential for mobilising historic contaminants, depending on the site.
 There may be a temporary visual impact from tall plant (e.g. cranes) and traffic (particularly HGVs).
 There may be minor negative effects on waste generation and the capacity of waste management facilities during construction and demolition.
No significant effects are anticipated in the following areas:
 Minimal or no radiological discharges are currently anticipated. This, together with strict regulation, means there are no likely significant effects on local health and well-being.
 There are no land use change issues.


Best use of existing nuclear sites is to add SMRs or concentrate renewables to make use of the existing grid facilities.