Posted: Jul 22, 2010 8:37 pm
newolder wrote:
Ignoring unitarity for a mo', something that calculates a probability of an area value that is statistically smudged and observer dependent looks like the beginning of tiling a landscape to me.
I suppose if you want to think of the quantum spacetime as a landscape, yes. But my understanding (maybe wrong ?) of the string landscape is that it's a landscape of possible theories, which is something not quite as nice like.
newolder wrote:
GLAST was renamed to the Fermi Telescope and its 1st year of ops. helped test any energy relation for c with no positive result: http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/GLAST ... _year.html
Ah thanks. I thought you might know - you seem to have your finger on the astrophysical pulse.