Posted: Nov 13, 2010 11:57 pm
by Someone
Awe, did I insult the closest person to a scientist you can think of who thought this was obvious by mistaking what his middle name was?
Now, you are certainly correct if you assert that perfectly plausible explanations have been adduced to resolve the issue, but your comprehension of what these arguments are is meager, to say the least, and you're demonstrably incompetent at making a good scientific argument (and your math is weak and manners absolutely without parallel in their atrociousness).
Also note that this very post, like others before, clearly indicates that I am not making the assumption you appear to believe I am.