Posted: Aug 24, 2011 7:58 am
Thanks.
No problem though, if I can't prove him wrong then I am happy to point out that he is simply setting the conditions to show that the God hypotheses works. In any case case there are usually implications which kills the argument like this:
John
No problem though, if I can't prove him wrong then I am happy to point out that he is simply setting the conditions to show that the God hypotheses works. In any case case there are usually implications which kills the argument like this:
Radioactive decay at a rate fast enough to permit a young earth would have produced enough heat to melt the earth (Meert 2002).
John