Posted: May 06, 2012 12:03 am
hackenslash wrote:He isn't being misleading, he's explaining in detail why what we think of as nothing isn't actually nothing, thus the title is entirely appropriate.
No, it isn't. The point is that what Krauss thinks of as nothing isn't actually nothing.
"What part of 'nothing' don't you understand?": http://edwardfeser.blogspot.de/2011/11/ ... t-you.html