Posted: May 06, 2012 9:53 am
Teuton wrote:hackenslash wrote:He isn't being misleading, he's explaining in detail why what we think of as nothing isn't actually nothing, thus the title is entirely appropriate.
No, it isn't. The point is that what Krauss thinks of as nothing isn't actually nothing.
"What part of 'nothing' don't you understand?": http://edwardfeser.blogspot.de/2011/11/ ... t-you.html
Is there a fucking echo in here? That's precisely what I said, and what I have been saying. When physicists talk about nothing they don't mean nothing, which is what Krauss' point has been all along.
Oh, and why are you linking me to what a fucking navel-gazer thinks on the topic? Are you doing that to deliberately piss me off? I don't give a flying fuck what a navel gazer thinks on the topic, including you. When will you ever get the fucking message that staring at the lint in your belly button is fucking worthless?