Posted: May 06, 2012 10:01 am
Teuton wrote:hackenslash wrote:He isn't being misleading, he's explaining in detail why what we think of as nothing isn't actually nothing, thus the title is entirely appropriate.
No, it isn't. The point is that what Krauss thinks of as nothing isn't actually nothing.
"What part of 'nothing' don't you understand?": http://edwardfeser.blogspot.de/2011/11/ ... t-you.html
But you can't have this 'actual nothing' without violating the laws of physics. This actual nothing philosophy fools around with is impossible as per our understanding of physics.