Posted: May 07, 2012 11:58 am
by hackenslash
Teuton wrote:
hackenslash wrote:He isn't being misleading, he's explaining in detail why what we think of as nothing isn't actually nothing, thus the title is entirely appropriate.


No, it isn't. The point is that what Krauss thinks of as nothing isn't actually nothing.

"What part of 'nothing' don't you understand?": http://edwardfeser.blogspot.de/2011/11/ ... t-you.html


I've been having a think about this, and I have a question. Are you planning to pen a slew of indignant posts about Mattesons because their hot dogs don't have dogs in?