Posted: May 26, 2013 7:30 pm
lobawad wrote:
If you would like to have a discussion on Richard Dawkins, you could start by not putting words into his mouth. Any literate person who has read him, watched the interviews and so on, will immediately see that that is what you are doing.
I vehemently disagree with you that I have "put words into his mouth"; I am simply expressing my opinion about Richard Dawkins and, indeed, the way in which he comes across to me.
I have no idea what you're talking about here.
lobawad wrote:
I have no opinion on Richard Dawkins. Never even met the guy. I do have an opinion on whomever you've been learning philosophy from: they owe you your money back.
Well, I see that you have already resorted to argumentum ad hominem. Perhaps you could make the effort to engage in the discussion instead of resorting to vacuous and disparaging remarks.