rationalskepticism.org

John Platko wrote:

SafeAsMilk wrote:

John Platko wrote:

SafeAsMilk wrote:
No, I'm sure you have. Perhaps we can develop a John Platko phrase generator, misusing half-digested phrases from various theoretical physics papers and mashing them together into a pseudo-intellectual mess. Chopra would be proud.

It sure as hell would save a lot of time But I do better than that. I show my work.

Indeed, you parroting half digested information from various papers is shown just about every time you post

I've demonstrated practical (perhaps impractical?) use of that paper. In other words, I'm not just making shit up. I've demonstrated how meaning defines the horizon of optimization. Which makes this thread very curious indeed.

You've demonstrated jack, as usual. I know vacuous, pseudo-scientific gibberish makes your cheeks hot, but most folks don't find transparent trolling that curious at all.

I started using CT about here and demonstrated how what is possible and what is not possible bounds the optimization space and defines meaning.