Posted: Apr 21, 2017 4:52 pm
by Thomas Eshuis
ProgrammingGodJordan wrote:
OlivierK wrote:
ProgrammingGodJordan wrote:
Let's break thing down toddler style:

To put it simply, God is not redefined on the boundary of that scientifically unfounded sequence.
The difference between these two, are that:

(1) No science for an outside intelligence speaking to humans. (No humans speaking to conscious entities inside their simulations either)
(2) There is science for humans creating crude universes.

(3) No science for an outside intelligence creating universes.
(4) There is science for humans speaking.

You got nothing.


Yes, there is no error detected in the redefinition as far as science goes.

There are however as far as linguistics and common sense are concerned.