Posted: Apr 21, 2017 4:57 pm
ProgrammingGodJordan wrote:OlivierK wrote:
There's no evidence of god speaking to humans, so we can purge that as scientifically unfounded and just redefine god as any being whose ability to speak is founded in science. So humans are gods, because they can speak, according to this (stupid) argument.
There's no evidence of god creating the universe, so we can purge that as scientifically unfounded and just redefine god as any being whose ability to create universes is founded in science. So humans are gods, because they write crude simulations that we call universes for no good reason, according to this this (doubly stupid) argument.
It appears you know somewhat grasp the redefinition.
This is what science does, better approximates models with empirically bounded data.
In a similar way, unfounded properties were purged from astronomy over the years.
Since theism isn't a scientific model, theory or concept, your argument fails, again.