rationalskepticism.org

ProgrammingGodJordan wrote:

Thomas Eshuis wrote:

ProgrammingGodJordan wrote:
(A)

Small nitpick:
Crude may mean approximation.
Simulations like illustris are theoretical, simulated approximations of the cosmos.

FIFY.
They are not however a cosmos.

Ironically the redefinition particularly purges the instance that our cosmos was forged by some higher intelligence, and instead refers to crude cosmos/simulations.

Thus becoming ever more devoid and detached from it's common usage.

ProgrammingGodJordan wrote:The very definition in (A) above describes the instance that crude cosmos is not the actual thing.

So, according to your asinine humpty-dumpty definition, computers are gods.

ProgrammingGodJordan wrote:Your expressions are disappointing...

If only I cared for your trollish disappointment....

ProgrammingGodJordan wrote:

Thomas Eshuis wrote:
Stop projecting your own faults onto your interlocutors.

My only fault here here is existing in a universe where you (and humans/"sheeple" like you) also exist...

QED more personal attacks and thereby a demonstration that Jordan either hasn't read the FUA he signed, or is a troll.