Posted: Aug 03, 2019 1:09 pm
by Spearthrower
1 last point that needs to be addressed. Let's imagine for a moment that the victim had some unfortunate reaction to antimalarials (which apparently isn't the case) and consequently that her death can be directly ascribed to the usage of that drug. Surely that needs to be put into the context of the number of people who are saved from malaria each year, who don't have tragically shortened life spans ending writing in agony. So even at the work case reading, it's still 1 death compared to... tens of millions of lives saved?