rationalskepticism.org

AtheismIsIrrational wrote:

[Reveal] Spoiler: content on which I am not commenting

CdesignProponentsist wrote:

AtheismIsIrrational wrote:No, it's for YOU to prove that demons don't exist. It explains why there is natural evil.

So you make an unfounded claim and it is the responsibility of others to prove it wrong, otherwise it should become the established explanation.

Okay, so i contend that it isn't demons at all. It is leprechauns.


The ball is in your court.

I'll say it again: Unless, you can prove why demons are illogical or evidence that don't exist. It can explain why there is natural evil without hurting God's all-lovingness.

Leprechauns could also acceptable to why there is evil without going against God's all-lovingness.