Posted: May 17, 2012 3:51 pm
amkerman wrote:rEvolutionist wrote:Shrunk wrote:rEvolutionist wrote:Why am I being ignored? And why is my god = a carrot argument not being taken seriously?
To be honest, it's not exactly structured as an argument, is it?
If we say "God is a carrot", we are already stating that God exists, carrots exist (or at least one carrot does) and God is a carrot. So I don't really think the 2nd premise and conclusion add anything.
Exactly. Now if only we could get Amkerman to understand that about his version, then we could put this thread to bed!
I don't think this is on topic as I have still not made an argument for the existence of God, only the belief in the existence of subject-independent consciousness, which I have defined as God.
You cannot argue for a belief. I can believe a square circle exists, and can continue to do so no matter what argument you make. Just another of the very basic errors you are making here.