Posted: Oct 03, 2012 1:02 pm
justintime wrote:Spearthrower, You have been admonished by other members for your patently objectionable approach.Gary S. Gaulin wrote: Study the theory with an unbiased open mind please, before offering your opinion, you'll find out for yourself. Asking for citation after citation and dumb questions like "Who's this 'we'?" when it should be obvious while talking down at me like I'm a child is not getting either of us anywhere. I was hoping for honest unbiased opinion on the theory, not spears thrown at me before you even look at it.
Theory of Intelligent Design
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/creat ... 32-20.html
So Gary has a whinge that big meanies are asking for actual evidence and objecting to his increasingly paternalistic yet increasingly incoherent ranting. Somehow I don't think Spearthrower or anyone else will be too concerned.
Gary has a "theory" too donchaknow. His is a unified theory of absolutely everything. Much greater vision than you has Gary, instead of "unifying" evolution he renders it obsolete in one fell swoop.
Much like you though he can't explain what his conjectures actually entail or provide any actual evidence for them either.
Your unificating "theory" doesn't even rate amongst other crackpot "theories". How sad.
