rationalskepticism.org

Mick wrote:

Rumraket wrote:

Mick wrote:

Rumraket wrote:
No, that's what experience has taught me.

Oh, so there's an argument behind this? Well, let's hear it.

"They'll be on my blog some time in the future".

I'm actually almost finished it.

Congratulations, but it doesn't really matter. There's no need for me to produce an argument, I'm simply telling you what my experience has been. I've never heard a theistic "moral argument" that didn't in the end reduce to an appeal to emotional revulsion at some kind of moral dilemma that would purportedly not be deductively solvable.

That's what they all reduce to, you wouldn't have an ultimate solution to X - therefore people would be allowed to rape babies and murder each other and that would be terrible. Oooh, aaaahh! Better praise the lord then.