Posted: Oct 21, 2016 5:01 pm
When did I say they didn't?
What the laws of physics require is the existence of objects regardless of their magnitude.
So you say. Show your work.
So what about a triangle that exists hypothetically, but not in anyone's mind? That is to say, was the Pythagorean theorem true 13 billion years ago, when (most likely) no life existed in the universe? I would say it was. Whereas your argument, if you follow it, would lead to the conclusion that the Pythagorean theorem not yet true then. Is that actually your position?
Pythagoras' theorem requires the existence of two dimensions wherein a triangle or circle can reside.
Or maybe it doesn't. Your saying so doesn't really prove much, does it?