Posted: Jan 29, 2019 8:08 am
Good morning, maybe I am quoting from Teske? Sorry, I missed the rule that everything must be fully referenced and written in a Lancet type style.
Isn’t time a science subject?
I am not allowed to reference Barbour?
http://platonia.com/
Or Kraus
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/book ... rauss.html
Or discuss a church father’s views on a rational board by replacing soul models with complex adaptive systems and thus attempt to start discussion of a way to resolve the determinism freewill paradox.
But ok, it is all bull crap , let’s not even try and tease out something around what nothing and infinity mean.
Isn’t time a science subject?
I am not allowed to reference Barbour?
http://platonia.com/
Or Kraus
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/book ... rauss.html
Or discuss a church father’s views on a rational board by replacing soul models with complex adaptive systems and thus attempt to start discussion of a way to resolve the determinism freewill paradox.
But ok, it is all bull crap , let’s not even try and tease out something around what nothing and infinity mean.