Posted: Apr 28, 2019 8:22 am
Pebble wrote:Thomas Eshuis wrote:Pridefel Knowitelz wrote:Svartalf wrote:Given the obvious trollishness of both in the context of this forum, I'd go so far as to say that you're actually striving to displease as many as you can.
I've seen some signatures and avatars here that I don't agree with. Doesn't upset me. No one is forcing you to get upset. Anyway, what I do with my signature and avatar is wildly off topic, which makes it even more bizarre that anyone would feel the need to bring it up, while criticizing me for going off topic.
Since the topic is about theism, atheism and science it's perfectly on topic to point out that your signature is counterfactual claim.
But since PK does not rely on facts or logic for his/her claims, what is the issue?
The issue is that in science, the burden proof lies with the claimant, so where it concerns the question of (a)theism, the burden of proof lies with theists. And not as PK's signature asserts, atheists.