Posted: Jun 24, 2019 10:21 am
by OlivierK
tuco wrote:They could just say they don't support violence but I guess they prefer not to prattle.

Who is "they"? Rugby Australia or GoFundMe?

Regardless, both organisations have indeed said that they're not helping Folau get paid because they object to the harm caused by his comments, in line with their pre-existing policies on such matters.

I'm wondering what those who take issue with either RA or GoFundMe's actions would propose? That RA be compelled to employ Folau in spite of a contractual breach? That GoFundMe be compelled to host a fundraiser that doesn't comply with their eligibility criteria? And that all this compulsion be done in the name of FREEDOM!!1! (for Israel Folau to break rules without consequence)?