Posted: Sep 27, 2010 10:14 am
Ichthus77,
Are you planning on addressing any of the arguments that were raised against your previous posts since you bowed out of this discussion? Here and here for example? Or are you just planning to advertise your blog and leave?
BTW, it's a bit rich for a proponent of the Kalam Cosmological Argument ("Everything that begins to exist has a cause. So God didn't begin to exist, because he is the cause of everything that exists. Therefore, God exists because everything that begins to exist needs a cause, and God is that cause.") to accuse others of making "circular arguments".
Are you planning on addressing any of the arguments that were raised against your previous posts since you bowed out of this discussion? Here and here for example? Or are you just planning to advertise your blog and leave?
BTW, it's a bit rich for a proponent of the Kalam Cosmological Argument ("Everything that begins to exist has a cause. So God didn't begin to exist, because he is the cause of everything that exists. Therefore, God exists because everything that begins to exist needs a cause, and God is that cause.") to accuse others of making "circular arguments".