Posted: Apr 05, 2011 8:47 pm
by Paul Almond
IIzO wrote:
2. It is proposed that a being has maximal greatness if it has maximal excellence in every possible world.

Seriously , how is this not begging the question ?"maximal excellence in every possible world" is rejecting every possible worlds where maximal greatness is less than maximal excellence without justification .
The proposition is not acceptable to me ,there are no direct equivalence between maximal greatness and maximal excellence.

I don't have any real problem with that really: it's just a definition. I view it as extremely vague, but I'm sure an apologist could tighten it up if he had too.