Posted: Apr 05, 2011 9:31 pm
by Mick
Shrunk wrote:
Mick wrote:I'm not too sure what I should reply to here. You're just making allegations. There's no argument which I can make sense out of, and your subsequent post is bludgeoning in terms of its length despite my request for brevity.


I don't see how it can be possible that someone could be unable to "make sense out of" Paul's clear, precise and specific arguments, lengthy though they may be, while claiming to be able to understand Plantinga's convoluted, obscure and misleading bafflegab. I guess those God-goggles only work when you want them to.


Pick out the premises within that post then. I'm not talking about the lengthy post, but just the one I recently replied to.