Posted: Jan 29, 2016 9:59 pm
Gareth wrote:Thanks romansh. I had a look, and if you read the section called Wing-Pressure Orifices you'll see that they used the same flawed methodology used in the original experiment that I mentioned in the first place i.e using open ended orifices. Have none of these people ever heard of Venturi?
So, yes. That was very useful indeed. Thank you.
So, the only data presented so far you reject. Where is your evidence of three times greater pressure difference under the wing than above it?
Published data from NASA has rather more credibility than mere assertions from an unknown person who just joined a forum.