Posted: Mar 14, 2016 2:23 am
Thank you for your response.Calilasseia wrote:MrIntelligentDesign wrote:Calilasseia wrote:I see he's still posting the contents of his discoursive rectal passage. As for his books, they're illiterate tripe. Frankly, I'd enjoy more success mething which, lo and behold, another piece of software, in the form of the Isabelle theorem prover, happens to be capable of doing. You can learn more about Isabelle here.
But you are really confuse. SO CONFUSE that you have no science at all.
You are always using the term intelligence and yet you don't know what it is.
In the link that I've given you, there are 70 definitions of intelligence. Which definition do you think is the real one and universal? Can I use that definition (the you had concluded as science) in the origin of particles, or life or my PC or my bike or my car or the earth? ONE DEFINITION to cover all X in the topic of intelligence..
YOU DON'T have any clue on intelligence and you had claimed that is was difficult. Of course, it would be very difficult, yes, since you are talking intelligence when you should be talking non-intelligence!
You are simply talking non-intelligence when you talk intelligence based on the stupidity of ToE.
Thus, once again...READ my link to you about the 70 definitions of intelligence and use simple math to categorize which X is intelligence and which X is non-intelligence.
I cannot spoon feed you..I think that you are smart since you are against me..
Now, can you do it?? USE the power of ToE on its 160 years of existence and see if you can. IF not, I will conclude that you are not honest person...