Posted: Mar 14, 2016 4:12 am
YOU ARE REALLY CONFUSED!Calilasseia wrote:MrIntelligentDesign wrote:Calilasseia wrote:MrIntelligentDesign wrote:
Please, take your bullshit and your self-aggrandisement, and shove them. Because all you're offering here is made up shit of such a palsied, spastic level, as to make my tropical fish wet themselves laughing at the inanity of your offerings. There are single celled life forms that perform better than you on the data processing front.
Your confusion is soooooo deep that your intellectual mind had made you lazy in rediscovering the real and universal intelligence.
THESE ARE the things that we AGREED:
1. Intelligence is a very difficult topic.
Yes, I agreed. The proof for this was that we have probably 80+ definitions of intelligence, which means, no one had ever nailed intelligence..but I've already nailed intelligence and one definition and explanation is enough to summarize all definitions of intelligence that our best thinkers had incorrectly invented.
The cause for this was the stupidity of ToE. As long as you cling to ToE and not science, you will never understand the real intelligence and you cannot nail intelligence for the res of your life..MARK MY WORD for that...
2. Science has always an experiment and has always an empirical test or experiment.
I agreed on this things but even though you agree on this things, you are negating and not following this method. Instead of making experiment for yourself if all of the 70 definitions of intelligence are real intelligence, you mocked me.
Your mockery only tells me that YOU HAVE NO CLUE on the real intelligence. You are hopeless and pitiful..I don't know what should I do with you. But I hope that you could reset your intellectual and scientific mind and do what I've done when I discovered the real intelligence.