rationalskepticism.org

aufbahrung wrote:

felltoearth wrote:

aufbahrung wrote:See what I mean. Didn't even question their weltanschauung, only had to hint it could be questioned and it got them started.

You questioned nothing. You made an ambiguous statement that amounts to zilch. Per usual.

Ambiguity betrays my lack of confidence in science. It's a method, a algorithm, a blind robot in your control but gone bad on occasion. And you can't shut it down or find a viable alternative in spite of it destroying the planet whilst collecting data on the destruction. Wool, my yarn.