Posted: Dec 21, 2011 1:42 am
Exi5tentialist wrote:hackenslash wrote:Barry Cade wrote:Hitchens's support for the invasion of Iraq helped to sustain the ideological offensive launched by the US and its allies; it is not merely polemical to point out the reactionary consequences of this stance. While Hitchens was drunkenly lurching around the US lecture circuit, dazzling the gullible with his loquacity, the people of Fallujah were suffering and dying in their thousands.
If you want to get all sentimental about the recently deceased, I am sure Kim Jong-il's family would appreciate a Xmas card.
What a feeble pile of ignorant, festering fucking guff.
On the contrary, Barry Cade's paragraph above is insightful, eloquent, on-topic and wholly accurate, unlike your own. hackenslash, I do not know if there is a word for a sentence that describes itself, but I think you have produced one there.
What a brilliant riposte, even on behalf of somebody who can't be bothered to defend his own ignorant bollocks.
Insightful? Only insofar as one can see up one's own rectum. Eloquent? Hahahahahahahaha!
Keep trying, Exi, and you might one day understand what some of those words mean, and indeed what reality looks like. I doubt it, but there's always hope if you keep banging the rocks together.