rationalskepticism.org

Strontium Dog wrote:

chairman bill wrote:Er, you & Carl have managed it a few times in one fucking thread, so don't give me this shit. FFS.

I see you provided no examples to support your assertion. Wonder why.

Yoiu want examples? You'll get fucking examples.

CarlPierce wrote:... And you are willing to forgive the Labour party sending freedom fighters back to Libya but you condemn the lib-dems for not managing to get one of their policies included in the coalition agreement.

Was it real or Rendition Labour that introduced fees in the first place ?

Which way does your moral compass point exactly ?

The suggestion that it was Labour, as opposed to certain ministers, is simplistic nonsense of course, but either way, the statement that asserts that I would forgive those that engaged in rendition to Libya is a fucking lie. So strike one.

Here's some more bollocks ...

Strontium Dog wrote:... Bang on. Bill laments "New Labour and "Rendition Labour" and wants a return to "Real Labour", not seeming to appreciate that they are all the same thing; one party, indivisible ...

Again, a misrepresentation of my position. Strike two.

CarlPierce wrote:... you happily misrepresent the Lib-dems position on univ course funding knowing full well its simply a policy we weren't able to get into the coalition agreement.

Untrue. A lie. Strike three.

CarlPierce wrote:... I'm puzzled by your apparant forgiveness for rendition (why still support Labour if you haven't forgiven them) but con-dem the lib-dems for not managing to get a policy implemented.

This shit, on a thread I started, calling for the jailing of those Labour ministers responsible for UK involvement in rendition! Idiocy of the most profound nature, or just plain lying & trolling? You decide. But strike number fucking four.

And that's from just one page, on one thread. Get your head out of your arse & recognise the misrepresentation that you & your ilk engage in.