Posted: Jul 15, 2013 9:02 pm
Weaver wrote:
The Medical Examiner who did the autopsy did very poorly on the stand, and was convincingly refuted by an expert witness brought in by the defense, who showed that in his professional opinion the wounds were consistent with Martin being on top of Zimmerman when the round was fired.
Really - you have to acknowledge everything that came out at trial, not just the prosecution side of things.
I do not have access to the entire trial transcripts. But the autopsy report is not a prosecution document, it is an expert report of fact. The interpretation of said facts is what is challenged, not the facts themselves. What I have reproduced above is written evidence, I do not have access to the full trial transcripts, so I do not know whether the above was shown incorrect or not, have you contradictory evidence?