Posted: Jul 16, 2013 12:42 am
by CdesignProponentsist
Steve wrote:
If you’re ever in a heated argument with anyone, and you’re pretty sure there aren't any witnesses, it’s always best to kill the other person. They can’t testify, you don’t have to testify, no one else has any idea what happened; how can the state ever prove beyond a doubt is wasn't self-defense?

What is this "no witnesses" thing everybody keeps bringing up? There was a witness, and he testified that Martin was on top of Zimmerman and was the aggressor.

This witness seems to vanish from the scene dependent on opinion of guilt.