rationalskepticism.org

purplerat wrote:

chango369 wrote:

purplerat wrote:

When I buy Apple Wood Bacon why shouldn't I expect there to be some apple and wood along with that bacon.

Only if they listed apples and wood as ingredients, yes.

Again, who are these people who bother to read the ingredients but not the nutritional values? You'd have a point if products were sold with only a vague list of ingredients and nothing else but the nutritional values are right there next to the ingredients, usually even more prominently displayed.

I don't know who they are and I don't understand the relevancy of the question. I do have a point. The listing of almonds as an ingredient is not vague, but rather specific. The 'necessary' processing to arrive at a 'milk substitute' subtracts out not only the nutritive value, but renders the accuracy of almonds appearing on the ingredient list null and void. I think the class action lawsuit is proper and warranted.