Posted: May 19, 2017 5:34 pm
by Macdoc
Do you actually understand the circumstances.....I don't think so...

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-12-07/j ... ns/8099276

Let's take one single point

Agreed facts to the UK Supreme Court 2012 Ecuador Foreign Minister Ricardo Paino Asylum Grant Press Conference transcript
6. Assange has already been cleared and the woman says the police made it up in order to ’get him’. On August 25 2010, Assange was cleared of the suspicion of ’rape’ by Stockholm’s Chief Prosecutor Eva Finne, who stated she "made the assessment that the evidence did not disclose any offence of rape". On 25 of August, the prosecutor stated that "The conduct alleged disclosed no crime at all and that file (K246314-10) would be closed".

The case was only resurrected after a politician, Claes Borgstrom, intervened in the case. The police report states that she felt “railroaded by police and others around her”. While she was at the police station to inquire about HIV tests she sent messages to friends saying that she that she "did not want to put any charges on JA but that the police were keen on grabbing him" (14:26) and “did not want to accuse JA for anything”; that “it was the police who made up the charges”; and that she was “shocked when they arrested JA" because she "only wanted him to take a [HIV] test” (17:06).
Agreed facts to the UK Supreme Court 2012


You better read the entire thing as you clearly have zero understanding of it

https://justice4assange.com/assange-cas ... ecker.html

It's been a witch hunt from the get go ....even the girl he was with acknowledged that....that she did not want him charged with anything and just wanted him to have a STD test.....

Your view is substantially flawed...... just what don't you understand about this?

Stockholm’s Chief Prosecutor Eva Finne, who stated she "made the assessment that the evidence did not disclose any offence of rape".