rationalskepticism.org

Teague wrote:

SafeAsMilk wrote:

Teague wrote:

purplerat wrote:
It's not.

When is it ever the answer to racial inequality to make things equally unjust for everybody?

What's wrong with everyone feeling the full extent of the police state?

Nothing, if you're pro-police state. If you're not, well, the question answers itself.

Scared that people might rebel against it and make a change? Too scared to stand up with your kinsmen and stand with them?

Gosh, that's so brave of you to volunteer some teenagers for your armchair revolution. How bout you get off your ass and take the lumps yourself instead of shrieking on the internet, or are you too scared to actually suffer some of the injustice you want to foist on others?

Since I'm not lynching anyone or breaking the law how the fuck does that even make sense?

Because you're demanding that some teenagers receive unjust treatment to benefit your armchair revolution. So why don't you take some unjust treatment for your armchair revolution instead of demanding that someone else take it? I guess that would require actual strength of conviction, and it's pretty clear you haven't got that.

So you're fine being a racist schumck then I see - we'll just keep it for the blacks, right?

Now that makes no sense. I'm actually interested in justice for everyone, but apparently you're not. Thanks for showing everyone here what a coward you are though, and how you're willing to shriek "racist" when you're the one deciding that someone should experience injustice because of the color of their skin